Dublin App Server - solid container (finally) for WCF/WF ?
author: Srdjan Strbanovic | posted @ Wednesday, October 29, 2008 6:00 PM | Feedback (0)
OSLO is cool. Very early though...
I guess PDC 2009 will be when it comes alive...
author: Srdjan Strbanovic | posted @ Wednesday, October 29, 2008 5:55 PM | Feedback (0)
Not new, but...
WCF 3.5 rocks!
author: Srdjan Strbanovic | posted @ Wednesday, October 29, 2008 1:01 PM | Feedback (0)
REST almost everywhere...
author: Srdjan Strbanovic | posted @ Wednesday, October 29, 2008 1:00 PM | Feedback (0)
Silverlight is ready!
No more client code on the server! Ever!
author: Srdjan Strbanovic | posted @ Wednesday, October 29, 2008 12:58 PM | Feedback (0)
Microsoft please call Windows 2008 R2 - Windows 7 Server
author: Srdjan Strbanovic | posted @ Wednesday, October 29, 2008 12:57 PM | Feedback (0)
This article describes new framework, published under
LGPL by
Philip Laureano. Framework supports:
-
Dynamic Proxies
-
Duck Typing, and Late Binding
-
Ruby-style Mixins
-
Delegates with Lambda Arguments (aka, 'Currying')
-
Universal Event Handling
-
A Very, Very Simple IoC Container
-
Design by Contract
This impressive list of features, and benchmarks show a
very fast implementation for DynamicProxy. Wow!
author: Srdjan Strbanovic | posted @ Tuesday, October 16, 2007 11:12 AM | Feedback (2)
This is where you go to get new Communication Client
SDK from Microsoft. Here is a short description:
"...provides a powerful and flexible API for building
client applications for Office Communications Server 2007."
And more:
"
The Microsoft Unified Communications Client API SDK
allows application developers to integrate Office
Communications Server 2007 enhanced VoIP, Video,
Instant Messaging, Conferencing, Telephony, Contact
Management and Presence into their applications. "
author: Srdjan Strbanovic | posted @ Friday, October 12, 2007 6:49 PM | Feedback (0)
Hard Disks bound IO is known to be a bottleneck in many high
end applications. Almost 10 years ago I ran into such problem
myself and ended up solving it by replacing hard disks used for
database storage with SSD drives. We paid $125,000 for 6GB
at that time, but it worked and price was Ok, since application
(High end Prepaid Call Platform) payed back for it in a couple
of weeks. SSD drives prices came down since then significantly,
but
this device seems to leap forward in performance x10 on
over today's SSD drives and x1000 over current generation of
disk drives. Interesting times...
author: Srdjan Strbanovic | posted @ Thursday, September 27, 2007 12:54 PM | Feedback (0)