...and miscodings http://blog.timok.com/Default.aspx Srdjan Strbanovic http://blog.timok.com/Default.aspx Subtext 2008-10-30T19:46:58Z http://blog.timok.com/archive/2008/10/29/PDC-2008--7.aspx 2008-10-29T18:00:46-04:00:00 2008-10-30T19:46:58Z Dublin App Server - solid container (finally) for WCF/WF ? <img src="http://blog.timok.com/aggbug/32.aspx" width="1" height="1" /> http://blog.timok.com/comments/32.aspx 0 http://blog.timok.com/comments/commentRss/32.aspx http://blog.timok.com/services/trackbacks/32.aspx http://blog.timok.com/archive/2008/10/29/PDC-2008--5.aspx 2008-10-29T17:55:48-04:00:00 2008-10-29T17:56:15Z OSLO is cool. Very early though... I guess PDC 2009 will be when it comes alive...<img src="http://blog.timok.com/aggbug/30.aspx" width="1" height="1" /> http://blog.timok.com/comments/30.aspx 0 http://blog.timok.com/comments/commentRss/30.aspx http://blog.timok.com/services/trackbacks/30.aspx http://blog.timok.com/archive/2008/10/29/PDC-2008--4.aspx 2008-10-29T13:01:24-04:00:00 2008-10-29T13:01:24Z Not new, but... WCF 3.5 rocks!<img src="http://blog.timok.com/aggbug/29.aspx" width="1" height="1" /> http://blog.timok.com/comments/29.aspx 0 http://blog.timok.com/comments/commentRss/29.aspx http://blog.timok.com/services/trackbacks/29.aspx http://blog.timok.com/archive/2008/10/29/PDC-2008--3.aspx 2008-10-29T13:00:44-04:00:00 2008-10-29T13:00:44Z REST almost everywhere...<img src="http://blog.timok.com/aggbug/28.aspx" width="1" height="1" /> http://blog.timok.com/comments/28.aspx 0 http://blog.timok.com/comments/commentRss/28.aspx http://blog.timok.com/services/trackbacks/28.aspx http://blog.timok.com/archive/2008/10/29/PDC-2008--2.aspx 2008-10-29T12:58:51-04:00:00 2008-10-29T12:58:51Z Silverlight is ready! No more client code on the server! Ever!<img src="http://blog.timok.com/aggbug/27.aspx" width="1" height="1" /> http://blog.timok.com/comments/27.aspx 0 http://blog.timok.com/comments/commentRss/27.aspx http://blog.timok.com/services/trackbacks/27.aspx http://blog.timok.com/archive/2008/10/29/PDC-2008--1.aspx 2008-10-29T12:57:15-04:00:00 2008-10-29T12:57:15Z Microsoft please call Windows 2008 R2 - Windows 7 Server<img src="http://blog.timok.com/aggbug/26.aspx" width="1" height="1" /> http://blog.timok.com/comments/26.aspx 0 http://blog.timok.com/comments/commentRss/26.aspx http://blog.timok.com/services/trackbacks/26.aspx http://blog.timok.com/archive/2007/10/26/Part-II-LinFu-published.aspx 2007-10-26T08:55:49-04:00:00 2007-10-26T08:55:49Z <div style="margin-left: 40px;">Get it <a href="http://plaureano.blogspot.com/2007/10/introducing-linfu-part-ii-adding.html">here...</a></div><img src="http://blog.timok.com/aggbug/25.aspx" width="1" height="1" /> http://blog.timok.com/comments/25.aspx 0 http://blog.timok.com/comments/commentRss/25.aspx http://blog.timok.com/services/trackbacks/25.aspx http://blog.timok.com/archive/2007/10/16/LinFu-DynamicProxy-IOC-Mixins-and-more.aspx 2007-10-16T11:12:28-04:00:00 2007-10-16T11:14:02Z <div style="margin-left: 40px;"><a href="http://www.codeproject.com/cs/library/LinFuPart1.asp">This article</a> describes new framework, published under <br /> LGPL by <strong><a set="yes" linkindex="24" href="http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/list_articles.asp?userid=101687">Philip Laureano</a></strong>. Framework supports:<br /> <ul> <li><span id="intelliTXT"></span> <address>Dynamic Proxies</address> </li> <li> <address><span id="intelliTXT"></span></address> <address>Duck Typing, and Late Binding</address> </li> <li> <address><span id="intelliTXT"></span></address> <address>Ruby-style Mixins</address> </li> <li> <address><span id="intelliTXT"></span></address> <address>Delegates with Lambda Arguments (aka, 'Currying')</address> </li> <li> <address><span id="intelliTXT"></span></address> <address>Universal Event Handling</address> </li> <li> <address><span id="intelliTXT"></span></address> <address>A Very, Very Simple IoC Container</address> </li> <li> <address><span id="intelliTXT"></span></address> <address>Design by Contract</address> </li> </ul> This impressive list of features, and benchmarks show a <br /> very fast implementation for DynamicProxy. Wow! <br /> </div><img src="http://blog.timok.com/aggbug/24.aspx" width="1" height="1" /> http://blog.timok.com/comments/24.aspx 2 http://blog.timok.com/comments/commentRss/24.aspx http://blog.timok.com/services/trackbacks/24.aspx http://blog.timok.com/archive/2007/10/12/Microsoft-releases-Unified-Communications-Client-API-SDK.aspx 2007-10-12T18:49:00-04:00:00 2007-10-12T20:39:34Z <div style="margin-left: 40px;"><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=82c468da-3294-4ca9-bbcc-d455cfd06af2&amp;displaylang=en">This</a> is where you go to get new Communication Client<br /> SDK from Microsoft. Here is a short description:<br /> <br /> "...provides a powerful and flexible API for building <br /> client applications for Office Communications Server 2007." <br /> <br /> And more:<br /> <br /> "<span>The Microsoft Unified Communications Client API SDK <br /> allows application developers to integrate Office <br /> Communications Server 2007 enhanced VoIP, Video, <br /> Instant Messaging, Conferencing, Telephony, Contact <br /> Management and Presence into their applications. </span>"</div><img src="http://blog.timok.com/aggbug/23.aspx" width="1" height="1" /> http://blog.timok.com/comments/23.aspx 0 http://blog.timok.com/comments/commentRss/23.aspx http://blog.timok.com/services/trackbacks/23.aspx http://blog.timok.com/archive/2007/09/27/Revolution-in-storage-technology.aspx 2007-09-27T12:54:55-04:00:00 2007-10-02T12:39:55Z <div style="margin-left: 40px;">Hard Disks bound IO is known to be a bottleneck in many high<br /> end applications. Almost 10 years ago I ran into such problem <br /> myself and ended up solving it by replacing hard disks used for <br /> database storage with SSD drives. We paid $125,000 for 6GB <br /> at that time, but it worked and price was Ok, since application <br /> (High end Prepaid Call Platform) payed  back for it in a couple <br /> of weeks. SSD drives prices came down since then significantly,  <br /> but <a href="http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/34065/135/">this device</a> seems to leap forward in performance x10 on <br /> over today's SSD drives and  x1000 over current generation of <br /> disk drives. Interesting times...<br /> </div><img src="http://blog.timok.com/aggbug/22.aspx" width="1" height="1" /> http://blog.timok.com/comments/22.aspx 0 http://blog.timok.com/comments/commentRss/22.aspx http://blog.timok.com/services/trackbacks/22.aspx